The Outer Worlds 2 Premium Edition Features a Humorous "Consumerism" Flaw

Obsidian Entertainment's latest role-playing game, The Outer Worlds 2, has embraced a trend prevalent in the gaming industry: offering premium editions with early access. While many players express disdain for such practices, their continued profitability suggests they are effective for studios. The Outer Worlds 2 is no exception, providing five days of early access for those who opt for the $100 premium version. This edition also includes additional content like two future DLCs, a digital artbook, soundtrack, and cosmetic bundles, which arguably justify the higher price point.

Interestingly, the game introduces a unique \"Flaw\" called \"Consumerism\" specifically for premium edition purchasers. Flaws are typically optional in-game debuffs with minor benefits, often triggered by gameplay events. However, this particular flaw is explicitly linked to the premium purchase, humorously acknowledging players' willingness to spend extra. The \"Consumerism\" flaw, as detailed by a Reddit user, describes players as being swayed by marketing and sales rather than sound financial planning. Despite this playful jab, the flaw grants a practical advantage: a 10% reduction in vendor sales prices and a 15% reduction in purchase costs, effectively resulting in a net 5% discount at vendors. Additionally, players with this flaw may encounter unique dialogue options, which writers suggest are akin to low-intelligence responses, possibly recycled from other existing flaws, adding another layer of self-deprecating humor.

This integration of the \"Consumerism\" flaw highlights Obsidian's satirical take on modern gaming monetization. While the developers demonstrate self-awareness about the controversies surrounding early access and premium content, they continue to utilize these models. The game also features a DLC pack humorously named \"Commander Zane’s Anti-Monopolistic Battle Pack,\" a nod to Obsidian's ownership by Microsoft, a company often associated with monopolistic practices in the industry. This blend of irony and commercial strategy reflects the complex landscape of game development, where creative commentary coexists with business imperatives. Ultimately, while the flaw offers a laugh, the underlying concept of paying for early access remains a point of contention for many.